The New Yorker Bias and Reliability

gif of interactive media bias chart

Compare the scores of The New Yorker to other sources on our free Interactive Media Bias Chart®️. Click Here!

logo of The New Yorker

Bias: Strong Left

Reliability: Reliable, Analysis/Fact Reporting

Overall Score

The following are the overall bias and reliability scores for The New Yorker according to our Ad Fontes Media ratings methodology.

Bias: -12.41

Reliability: 41.10

Bias scores for articles and shows are on a scale of -42 to +42, with higher negative scores being more left, higher positive scores being more right, and scores closer to zero being minimally biased, equally balanced, or exhibiting a centrist bias.

Reliability scores for articles and shows are on a scale of 0-64. Scores above 36 are generally good; scores below 24 are generally problematic. Scores between 24-36 indicate a range of possibilities, with some sources falling there because they are heavy in opinion and/or analysis, and some because they have a high variation in reliability between content pieces.

Panels of analysts from Ad Fontes Media regularly review representative sample content to rate it for reliability and bias. Each panel of analysts comprises one left-leaning, one right-leaning, and one center-leaning analyst.

The team considers a variety of factors when rating content. To determine the bias score of a piece of content, we consider its language, its political position, and how it compares to other reporting from other sources on the same topic. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the source’s overall bias score.

To determine its reliability score, we consider the content’s veracity, expression, its title/headline, and graphics. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the source’s overall reliability score.

The bias rating, demonstrated on the horizontal axis of the Media Bias Chart®️, ranges from most extreme left to middle to most extreme right. The reliability rating, demonstrated on the chart’s vertical axis, rates sources on a scale from original fact reporting to analysis, opinion, selective/incomplete, misleading, and inaccurate/fabricated information.

Individual Content Sample Scores

These are the most recent content samples that Ad Fontes Media analysts have rated for this source.

Content Sample URL Bias Reliability
Anthropic and Donald Trump’s Dangerous Alignment Problem-651.33
How Much Is Trump Profiting Off the Presidency?-10.3350.33
The Mamdani Era Begins-18.3336.67
Trump’s Brazen Pact with the One Per Cent-8.6739.67
What Israel’s Leaders Can’t—or Won’t—Say About Biden’s Ceasefire Announcement-5.3343.0
The Inside Story of Microsoft’s Partnership with OpenAI0.057.0
Did a Nobel Peace Laureate Stoke a Civil War?0.056.33
The Great Cash-for-Carbon Hustle-148.33
Elon Musk’s Shadow Rule-2.1747.83
Robo-Taxis Are Legal Now0.045.33
Elon Musk’s X Factor-12.6727.67
Should Hotel Chains Be Held Liable for Human Trafficking?0.057.0
A New Generation of Robots Seems Increasingly Human0.044.67
How Alex Spiro Keeps the Rich and Famous Above the Law-146.33
Don’t Say You Haven’t Been Warned About Trump and 2024-2230.67
How Slutty Vegan Puts the Party in Plant-Based Food-5.3335.33
Behind the Expulsions of Two State Representatives in Tennessee-1436.0
What Kind of Mind Does ChatGPT Have?0.043.0
All Gaffes Are Not Created Equal: Biden vs. the Almighty Trump-1738.0
Is the Trump Indictment a “Legal Embarrassment”?-12.6738.67
Killing Invasive Species Is Now a Competitive Sport0.047.67
American Democracy Was Never Designed to Be Democratic-837.0
Donald Trump and the Sweepstakes Scammers-9.6744.67
Inside the War Between Trump and His Generals-10.3339.0
We’re Not Going Back to the Time Before Roe. We’re Going Somewhere Worse-1834.33