The Christian Science Monitor Bias and Reliability

gif of interactive media bias chart

Compare the scores of The Christian Science Monitor to other sources on our free Interactive Media Bias Chart®️. Click Here!

logo of The Christian Science Monitor

Bias: Middle

Reliability: Reliable, Analysis/Fact Reporting

Overall Score

The following are the overall bias and reliability scores for The Christian Science Monitor according to our Ad Fontes Media ratings methodology.

Bias: -2.52

Reliability: 44.23

Bias scores for articles and shows are on a scale of -42 to +42, with higher negative scores being more left, higher positive scores being more right, and scores closer to zero being minimally biased, equally balanced, or exhibiting a centrist bias.

Reliability scores for articles and shows are on a scale of 0-64. Scores above 36 are generally good; scores below 24 are generally problematic. Scores between 24-36 indicate a range of possibilities, with some sources falling there because they are heavy in opinion and/or analysis, and some because they have a high variation in reliability between content pieces.

Panels of analysts from Ad Fontes Media regularly review representative sample content to rate it for reliability and bias. Each panel of analysts comprises one left-leaning, one right-leaning, and one center-leaning analyst.

The team considers a variety of factors when rating content. To determine the bias score of a piece of content, we consider its language, its political position, and how it compares to other reporting from other sources on the same topic. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the source’s overall bias score.

To determine its reliability score, we consider the content’s veracity, expression, its title/headline, and graphics. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the source’s overall reliability score.

The bias rating, demonstrated on the horizontal axis of the Media Bias Chart®️, ranges from most extreme left to middle to most extreme right. The reliability rating, demonstrated on the chart’s vertical axis, rates sources on a scale from original fact reporting to analysis, opinion, selective/incomplete, misleading, and inaccurate/fabricated information.

Individual Content Sample Scores

These are the most recent content samples that Ad Fontes Media analysts have rated for this source.

Content Sample URL Bias Reliability
In Ukraine mining region, a US minerals deal raises hopes and doubts0.046.0
Canadian prime minister and election opponent say Trump must respect sovereignty-5.6741.33
Why extreme violence in the US has police trying new tactics-1.3343.33
Can Trump bypass the Senate to ram through controversial nominees?-4.6746.33
For Biden and Trump, debate offers a rare chance to change perceptions0.038.67
Amid isolation over Gaza, Israelis grapple with ‘becoming outcasts’1.045.0
US bid to cement global leadership stumbles in Gaza-2.3339.33
Pacific Northwest states search for gun control solutions-543.67
US bipartisan lawmakers agree on more school safety measures-3.6743.33
Finland joins NATO, bolsters security across Euro-Atlantic region0.044.67
Abortion, voting rights in question in Wisconsin Supreme Court race-1.6741.33
With ‘not guilty,’ Trump enters period of potential legal peril1.041.67
Donald Trump arraignment: US history or just another day in court?-0.6729.33
Will Ron DeSantis become the GOP’s standard-bearer?5.6741.67
First draft of history: What overturning Roe could mean for US0.046.0
Power pivot: What happens in states where wind dethrones King Coal?-3.3345.67
‘Constitutional carry’ comes to Texas. The trend in five charts.-4.3344.67
Meet the gun owners who support (some) gun control1.6746.33
Biden redefined ‘bipartisan.’ GOP moderates say it leaves them out.-0.3345.67
Reopen public schools? How Chicago became ground zero for debate.0.6746.0
Monday Sunrise Briefing: A US push for accountability0.3343.33
‘A fearless fighter’: Biden taps Kamala Harris for VP-4.6743.33
In South Africa, female ministers have a message: It’s time for equality-545.33
Trump’s executive actions: Legal? Helpful? Three questions.0.047.33
Beirut’s challenge: A wealth of volunteers and a deficit of trust-3.6747.0