Bias: Most Extreme Right

Reliability: Unreliable, Misleading

Background CTA chart

Compare the scores of Louder With Crowder to other sources on our free Interactive Media Bias Chart. Click Here!

Overall Score

The following are the overall bias and reliability scores for Louder With Crowder according to our Ad Fontes Media ratings methodology.

Reliability: 9.73

Bias: 31.05

Louder With Crowder is a podcast hosted by conservative political commentator and comedian Steven Crowder. The show focuses on news, entertainment and politics, and is branded as “the most politically incorrect show on the web.” Crowder was a contributor on Fox News until 2013; in 2017 “Louder with Crowder” debuted on CRTV. He has posted political commentary on his YouTube channel since 2009.

Panels of analysts from Ad Fontes Media regularly review representative sample content to rate it for reliability and bias. Each panel of analysts comprises one left-leaning, one right-leaning, and one center-leaning analyst.

The team considers a variety of factors when rating content. To determine its reliability score, we consider the content’s veracity, expression, its title/headline, and graphics. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the sample content’s overall reliability score.

To determine sample content’s bias score, we consider its language, its political position, and how it compares to other reporting or analysis from other sources on the same topic. We add each of these scores to the chart on a weighted scale, with the average of those creating the content’s overall bias score.

The bias rating, demonstrated on the Media Bias Chart®️ on the horizontal axis, ranges from most extreme left to middle to most extreme right. The reliability rating, demonstrated on the chart’s vertical axis, rates sources on a scale from original fact reporting to analysis, opinion, propaganda and inaccurate/fabricated information.

Reliability scores for articles and shows are on a scale of 0-64. Scores above 40 are generally good; scores below 24 are generally problematic. Scores between 24-40 indicate a range of possibilities, with some sources falling there because they are heavy in opinion and analysis, and some because they have a high variation in reliability between articles.

Bias scores for articles and shows are on a scale of -42 to +42, with higher negative scores being more left, higher positive scores being more right, and scores closer to zero being minimally biased, equally balanced, or exhibiting a centrist bias.